Hinglish
08-07 09:01 PM
Didn't understand you specifically mentioning "US Stem Graduate" in your signature. What do you want to convey through this statement. Ofcourse other statements looks OK.
I think what is being conveyed is NOT that he is superior .... but that he has been in the US atleast 2 yrs more than when he actually started the journey towards GC by formally putting in an application
I think what is being conveyed is NOT that he is superior .... but that he has been in the US atleast 2 yrs more than when he actually started the journey towards GC by formally putting in an application
wallpaper Glass-Samsung Wallpaper
bekugc
04-18 03:12 PM
Boogie,
lud indicates some work/updates being done in the system regarding ur case.
for ex: when u reply to an RFE, sometimes u see a cople of Lud updates before any affirmative action is taken on the case. this is the general observation regarding luds
lud indicates some work/updates being done in the system regarding ur case.
for ex: when u reply to an RFE, sometimes u see a cople of Lud updates before any affirmative action is taken on the case. this is the general observation regarding luds
casinoroyale
03-18 09:40 AM
I also don't think this is true. After you get your 3-year H1B extension beyound the 6-year limit and say your 485 gets denied while you are in 7th year, you can still stay and work for the rest of the 2 years on your H1B and use those 2 years to file for new LC etc.
Gurus, please advise, with the slew of mistaken 485 denials this is an important point to clarify.
He will be out of status. Your 3 year extension beyond the allowed 6 years is based on that LC/I-140 from which your I-485 was filed. If the I-485 is rejected you have no right to stay beyond 6 years.
It is best to not use more than 3 years of H-1 if you have a pending I-485. That way you have 3 more years of H-1 in case you get rejected. The pending I-485 gives you unlimited time in the form of EAD/AP. Dont waste your H-1 time.
It only makes sense to keep H-1 while you have AOS if your country of chargeability is ROW, which is usually current. If your country is backlogged, it will most likely extend your H-1 over six years. Please consult a proper immigration attorney before you do anything.
Gurus, please advise, with the slew of mistaken 485 denials this is an important point to clarify.
He will be out of status. Your 3 year extension beyond the allowed 6 years is based on that LC/I-140 from which your I-485 was filed. If the I-485 is rejected you have no right to stay beyond 6 years.
It is best to not use more than 3 years of H-1 if you have a pending I-485. That way you have 3 more years of H-1 in case you get rejected. The pending I-485 gives you unlimited time in the form of EAD/AP. Dont waste your H-1 time.
It only makes sense to keep H-1 while you have AOS if your country of chargeability is ROW, which is usually current. If your country is backlogged, it will most likely extend your H-1 over six years. Please consult a proper immigration attorney before you do anything.
2011 Samsung Star Wallpaper samsung
psaxena
06-25 12:13 PM
Guys lets do it and send as many we can...........
Ahoy sailors !!! sail ahead full throttle.
IMHO, this is a legitimate website as I have been getting updates from them regularly and they are the supporting group for illegal immigrants. As per the email I received today, anti-immigrants have sent 693,437 faxes to Washington this month to oppose reform.
Ahoy sailors !!! sail ahead full throttle.
IMHO, this is a legitimate website as I have been getting updates from them regularly and they are the supporting group for illegal immigrants. As per the email I received today, anti-immigrants have sent 693,437 faxes to Washington this month to oppose reform.
more...
sudhakar_p_v
05-27 07:25 PM
Hi all,
I have sent my application for ead renewal on 05/03 to phoenix lockbox. The application was rxd. and signed for on 05/04.
However i have not seen my checks cashed yet nor received any information from USCIS.
has anyone else experienced delays with phoenix lockbox?
What steps can i take now?
please advice.
I have sent my application for ead renewal on 05/03 to phoenix lockbox. The application was rxd. and signed for on 05/04.
However i have not seen my checks cashed yet nor received any information from USCIS.
has anyone else experienced delays with phoenix lockbox?
What steps can i take now?
please advice.
johnimmi
01-08 10:39 AM
Her visa stamp was expiring on 15Feb07 and she entered US in Dec'06 and she was carrying the extended H4 I-797 valid till 2009. The officer at POE gave the I-94 valid only till 15Feb07. I did lot of research and found the last action on I-94 invalidates the previous ones. So her I-94 was valid only till 15Feb07. I went to the local CBP office and the officer understood what I'm talking about. He took copy of I-94 and issued a new I-94. He faxed it to some company which keeps the I-94 database.
So if possible it's better to go in person and explain. My 2 cents.
I am in a similar situation. "guyfromsg" , you are correct about the 'last action rule'.
1) My old Visa(stamped on my passport) was from Oct 1 2005 - Oct 1 2008.
2) In 04/07, I moved to a new employer. New I797(and its corresponding I-94) is from 04/2007 - 04/2010.
3) Travelled outside US. Before returning, I didn't stamp a new Visa because my old Visa was still good. When returned in Jan 2008, at the POE , the officer issued a new I-94 and stamped the expiry date as Oct 1 2008. He mentioned that since the old visa was expiring on 2008 and because I didn't have a new Visa stamped (even though I had a new 797A) , he can't stamp the I-94 with the '2010' expiration date.
4) My attorney just raised a red flag. He mentioned that the 'last action rule' goes against me. The last
action in this case was 'issuance of a new I-94'. So, the best approach is to get it corrected at the
local CBP - Deferred Inspections Office. He is working on getting some paper work ready.
However, another way to get by this issue would have been to file for a H1-B renewal before my
new I-94(the one issued at the POE) expired.
My attorney explained that according to the new immigration laws, the CBP officer should have stamped the expiration date from the 'LATEST' 797A. Most of the times, the officer will just detach your
I-94 from the latest 797-A and stamp it. This way no one(foreign national + Customs) needs to maintain multiple I-94's. However, not all officers are updated with the current immigration laws and policies. Now I'm waiting for some response from the CBP. I will update this thread once I get some positive feedback.
Thanks for all the great info in this thread guys!!
regards
John.
So if possible it's better to go in person and explain. My 2 cents.
I am in a similar situation. "guyfromsg" , you are correct about the 'last action rule'.
1) My old Visa(stamped on my passport) was from Oct 1 2005 - Oct 1 2008.
2) In 04/07, I moved to a new employer. New I797(and its corresponding I-94) is from 04/2007 - 04/2010.
3) Travelled outside US. Before returning, I didn't stamp a new Visa because my old Visa was still good. When returned in Jan 2008, at the POE , the officer issued a new I-94 and stamped the expiry date as Oct 1 2008. He mentioned that since the old visa was expiring on 2008 and because I didn't have a new Visa stamped (even though I had a new 797A) , he can't stamp the I-94 with the '2010' expiration date.
4) My attorney just raised a red flag. He mentioned that the 'last action rule' goes against me. The last
action in this case was 'issuance of a new I-94'. So, the best approach is to get it corrected at the
local CBP - Deferred Inspections Office. He is working on getting some paper work ready.
However, another way to get by this issue would have been to file for a H1-B renewal before my
new I-94(the one issued at the POE) expired.
My attorney explained that according to the new immigration laws, the CBP officer should have stamped the expiration date from the 'LATEST' 797A. Most of the times, the officer will just detach your
I-94 from the latest 797-A and stamp it. This way no one(foreign national + Customs) needs to maintain multiple I-94's. However, not all officers are updated with the current immigration laws and policies. Now I'm waiting for some response from the CBP. I will update this thread once I get some positive feedback.
Thanks for all the great info in this thread guys!!
regards
John.
more...
cheg
07-13 04:18 AM
It's only 1:46 am here so i'm still waiting. Nothing new yet.:rolleyes:
2010 Wallpaper Creator for Samsung
Ennada
01-19 05:44 AM
This is the supervisor's information at newark airport and he is very keen to note that nobody is treated in an unprofessional manner. basically he is the manager of all CBP officer at newark
Newark International Airport Domenico Calise (973) 368-6000
please bring this incident of rude CBP officer at newark by calling above number so that they can take appropriate action against all the ill-treatment.
Thanks,
CBP Passenger Service Manager Listing
(11/03/2009)
Port of Entry Name Phone
Atlanta Hartsfield - Jackson International Airport Linda Fuller (404) 765-7175
Washington - Dulles International Airport Richard Hall (703) 661-2865
Philadelphia International Airport Dale Markowitz (215) 863-4204
Boston Logan International Airport Domenic DeSantis (617) 568 1810 Ext. 2318
Chicago - O'Hare International Airport Patrick Salgado (773) 894-2900 Ext. 2872
Detroit Metropolitan Airport Donald Vaughn (734) 941-6180 Ext. 438
Dallas - Ft. Worth International Airport Michael Morrow (972) 973-9873
Houston International Airport Courtney Green (281) 230-4730
Las Vegas International Airport William Jones (702) 736-2253 Ext. 224
Los Angeles International Airport Kris Rueda (310) 665-4545
Miami International Airport Daniel Lopez (305) 874-4300
Fort Lauderdale - Hollywood International Airport Roxanne J. Rodriguez (954) 761-2012
JFK International Airport Miguel Mercado (718) 553-5470
Newark International Airport Domenico Calise (973) 368-6000
Honolulu International Airport James Myers (808) 237-4608
San Francisco International Airport David Sanchez (650) 821-8663
San Juan International Airport Andres Vargas (787) 253-4511
Seattle - Tacoma International Airport Frank Rohrig (206) 851-9690
Orlando International Airport Enrique Archibold (407) 825-4356
Sanford International Airport Larry Sherman (407) 322-6019 Ext. 203
Newark International Airport Domenico Calise (973) 368-6000
please bring this incident of rude CBP officer at newark by calling above number so that they can take appropriate action against all the ill-treatment.
Thanks,
CBP Passenger Service Manager Listing
(11/03/2009)
Port of Entry Name Phone
Atlanta Hartsfield - Jackson International Airport Linda Fuller (404) 765-7175
Washington - Dulles International Airport Richard Hall (703) 661-2865
Philadelphia International Airport Dale Markowitz (215) 863-4204
Boston Logan International Airport Domenic DeSantis (617) 568 1810 Ext. 2318
Chicago - O'Hare International Airport Patrick Salgado (773) 894-2900 Ext. 2872
Detroit Metropolitan Airport Donald Vaughn (734) 941-6180 Ext. 438
Dallas - Ft. Worth International Airport Michael Morrow (972) 973-9873
Houston International Airport Courtney Green (281) 230-4730
Las Vegas International Airport William Jones (702) 736-2253 Ext. 224
Los Angeles International Airport Kris Rueda (310) 665-4545
Miami International Airport Daniel Lopez (305) 874-4300
Fort Lauderdale - Hollywood International Airport Roxanne J. Rodriguez (954) 761-2012
JFK International Airport Miguel Mercado (718) 553-5470
Newark International Airport Domenico Calise (973) 368-6000
Honolulu International Airport James Myers (808) 237-4608
San Francisco International Airport David Sanchez (650) 821-8663
San Juan International Airport Andres Vargas (787) 253-4511
Seattle - Tacoma International Airport Frank Rohrig (206) 851-9690
Orlando International Airport Enrique Archibold (407) 825-4356
Sanford International Airport Larry Sherman (407) 322-6019 Ext. 203
more...
nk2
06-04 11:33 PM
THIS IS AN OLD THREAD, PLEASE DON'T POST ANY MORE TO THIS, OTHERWISE IT WILL KEEP BUMPING UP. I POSTED TO THIS BY MISTAKE AND THAT IS WHY IT IS AT THE TOP NOW
DO NOT POST ANY MORE MESSAGES TO IT.
POST MESSAGES TO OTHER THREADS TO BUMP THIS DOWN
.
DO NOT POST ANY MORE MESSAGES TO IT.
POST MESSAGES TO OTHER THREADS TO BUMP THIS DOWN
.
hair Samsung Wallpapers Part 2
ScratchingHead
10-01 01:07 PM
It takes one week to get the visa stamped. I did it and went to India in August. They will schedule FP for you in a location close to you.
Shame on you....travel thru countries that don't steal your money in the form of 'transit visa'.
Shame on you....travel thru countries that don't steal your money in the form of 'transit visa'.
more...
anilsal
06-19 11:31 PM
try to join your state chapters at the earliest. The latest message is important.
hot samsung wallpaper creator tool
hariswaminathan
10-17 10:36 AM
I got an RFE for I-131 for both myself and my wife. They have asked for absolutely everything (I-485 receipt, I-140 approval, I-94s, I-797s, marriage certificate, Passport copies etc). As my lawyer said "they have thrown the kitchen sink at you".
I dont even know why - but the amount of documentation they have asked for seems absurd just to issue a travel document.
BTW - my EAD from the sample application was approved!
______________________
EB3 India (PD: 05/01/2004)
I-485 Receipt date: 07/23/2007
EAD approved: 09/04/2007
FP notices: ????
I-131 - RFE
GC: god knows when
I dont even know why - but the amount of documentation they have asked for seems absurd just to issue a travel document.
BTW - my EAD from the sample application was approved!
______________________
EB3 India (PD: 05/01/2004)
I-485 Receipt date: 07/23/2007
EAD approved: 09/04/2007
FP notices: ????
I-131 - RFE
GC: god knows when
more...
house wallpapers samsung. wallpaper
rinkurazdan
05-30 01:15 PM
call ur airport, I remember a friend got his I94 extended based on new I797 at the airport.
BTW- if u have an approved I797 and an expired I94, u are not out of status....when u travel next time out of country...keep current docs with u and when u reenter...the POE officer will give u i94 based on ur latest I797..
What I dont understand is when u entered US in may 06, with a I797 of 2010, why didnt the POE officer give u i94 until 2010?
BTW- if u have an approved I797 and an expired I94, u are not out of status....when u travel next time out of country...keep current docs with u and when u reenter...the POE officer will give u i94 based on ur latest I797..
What I dont understand is when u entered US in may 06, with a I797 of 2010, why didnt the POE officer give u i94 until 2010?
tattoo Samsung Star Wallpaper Set
mbartosik
03-30 05:50 PM
Before Nebraska service center retrogressed their processing dates I was able to speak with an IO. I asked her a few questions relevant to this.
There maybe a public USCIS rule / procedures that would confirm what she told me.
Q) When is the name check typically initiated
A> Soon after receipt
Q> Is my name check cleared.
A> wait a moment..... yes
I've also explained why Nebraska processing dates moved back...
1) Transfers from Texas
2) VB moving forward coupled with no pre-adjudication. Therefore they have to go back to older receipt dates.
3) 180 day name check rule taking effect -- clean up old cases.
4) Public processing date was internally known to be too far ahead of reality (and therefore causing service requests).
Now could USCIS hide behind name check now?
Probably not for more than 180 days, because you could file a WOM and win.
Can they stagnate processing dates --- yes, and there is a risk that they will around 2nd July 2007 date (last year's fiasco -- if I need remind anyone). That would make me barking mad since my receipt date is about 59 days before that.
A WOM will likely succeed when an individual is arbitrarily processed more slowly, and now name check is not an excuse. However, a WOM is much less likely to succeed when a whole group is processed slowly, since USCIS can always claim resource constraints. The happened with labor cert and BECs, the case(s) that I read the judge basically said to speed up one application would slow down another. So you need to show that you are behind the reasonable processing times with respect to others, then you can force USCIS's hand.
There maybe a public USCIS rule / procedures that would confirm what she told me.
Q) When is the name check typically initiated
A> Soon after receipt
Q> Is my name check cleared.
A> wait a moment..... yes
I've also explained why Nebraska processing dates moved back...
1) Transfers from Texas
2) VB moving forward coupled with no pre-adjudication. Therefore they have to go back to older receipt dates.
3) 180 day name check rule taking effect -- clean up old cases.
4) Public processing date was internally known to be too far ahead of reality (and therefore causing service requests).
Now could USCIS hide behind name check now?
Probably not for more than 180 days, because you could file a WOM and win.
Can they stagnate processing dates --- yes, and there is a risk that they will around 2nd July 2007 date (last year's fiasco -- if I need remind anyone). That would make me barking mad since my receipt date is about 59 days before that.
A WOM will likely succeed when an individual is arbitrarily processed more slowly, and now name check is not an excuse. However, a WOM is much less likely to succeed when a whole group is processed slowly, since USCIS can always claim resource constraints. The happened with labor cert and BECs, the case(s) that I read the judge basically said to speed up one application would slow down another. So you need to show that you are behind the reasonable processing times with respect to others, then you can force USCIS's hand.
more...
pictures Wallpapers for Samsung Corby
dilbert_cal
03-16 08:52 PM
I saw a similar thread in one of the anti-immigration forums.
It was about members of immigration voice using filthy language in public forums. Don�t remember the exact words but it read something like �is this kind of third world behavior we get by bringing in so-called HIGHLY SKILLED immigrants to USA?�
Are you referring to OP ( ganguteli )
"I saw this on an anti immigrant site by a M*****r. "
This is his first line of the post.
It was about members of immigration voice using filthy language in public forums. Don�t remember the exact words but it read something like �is this kind of third world behavior we get by bringing in so-called HIGHLY SKILLED immigrants to USA?�
Are you referring to OP ( ganguteli )
"I saw this on an anti immigrant site by a M*****r. "
This is his first line of the post.
dresses samsung corby genio touch
coopheal
08-14 02:14 PM
I love your optimism.
1) EB 2 will be current. You are saying 09 Apr. I disagree. It will be at least 2 years before EB2 can be current.
2) After EB2 is current EB3 ROW will be advanced. You are saying 09 Apr. Again I disagree. To make EB3 ROW current will take up to 2 years after EB2 is made current.
3) After that EB3 will move. You are saying 09 Apr. I couldn�t disagree more. Even after that EB3 will get visa not used by all others for that year.
Thanks for being optimistic about EB3 but EB3 movement is not going to happen anytime soon.
EB3 I and in general all EB applicants need a solution now.
Until this process becomes so painful for us that we either go back or do a mass movement to get some legislative relief there are no better days for us.
USCIS is trying to make EB2 all countries Current sometime during FY 2009. Of course "a few" 2004, 2005 cases will still be pending past Oct08 but hopefully not too many.
If EB1 and EB2 are shown as current soon, then the DOS can transfer the so-called "spillover" into EB3 ROW, then into EB3 IN & CH.
Based on available numbers, EB3 India / China will see rapid movement in dates April 09 Visa Bulletin onwards.
What will happen during 2009 in all likely hood is the following,
Almost all EB1 spillover will go to EB3. (~ 25k)
Some of EB1 and all of EB2 spillover will go to EB2 IN/CH (~ 10k to 15k)
In 2009, there will be no more Name Check delays - therefore expect rapid EB3 approvals after April 09.
1) EB 2 will be current. You are saying 09 Apr. I disagree. It will be at least 2 years before EB2 can be current.
2) After EB2 is current EB3 ROW will be advanced. You are saying 09 Apr. Again I disagree. To make EB3 ROW current will take up to 2 years after EB2 is made current.
3) After that EB3 will move. You are saying 09 Apr. I couldn�t disagree more. Even after that EB3 will get visa not used by all others for that year.
Thanks for being optimistic about EB3 but EB3 movement is not going to happen anytime soon.
EB3 I and in general all EB applicants need a solution now.
Until this process becomes so painful for us that we either go back or do a mass movement to get some legislative relief there are no better days for us.
USCIS is trying to make EB2 all countries Current sometime during FY 2009. Of course "a few" 2004, 2005 cases will still be pending past Oct08 but hopefully not too many.
If EB1 and EB2 are shown as current soon, then the DOS can transfer the so-called "spillover" into EB3 ROW, then into EB3 IN & CH.
Based on available numbers, EB3 India / China will see rapid movement in dates April 09 Visa Bulletin onwards.
What will happen during 2009 in all likely hood is the following,
Almost all EB1 spillover will go to EB3. (~ 25k)
Some of EB1 and all of EB2 spillover will go to EB2 IN/CH (~ 10k to 15k)
In 2009, there will be no more Name Check delays - therefore expect rapid EB3 approvals after April 09.
more...
makeup Tweety wallpaper Samsung Star
guest1978
09-17 01:05 PM
what is your PD, Country etc?
Hi everyone, I have been approved on 9/6/7.
only 92 days after AOS filing.
My sponsor, I did work with them from 2002-2007. They agree to file i-485 in the hopes economy would get better. However house builders are doing very bad now and they cannot take me back after approval.
The question is, does this spoiled my chances for citizenship?
Hi everyone, I have been approved on 9/6/7.
only 92 days after AOS filing.
My sponsor, I did work with them from 2002-2007. They agree to file i-485 in the hopes economy would get better. However house builders are doing very bad now and they cannot take me back after approval.
The question is, does this spoiled my chances for citizenship?
girlfriend Samsung Omnia HD wallpaper
realist
01-27 09:21 AM
I see an update on jan 24 on this bill to grant 55000 visas for advance degree holders from DV lottery. Does this mean progress? Rest of the immigration bills never make it to the sub committee.
Jan 5th Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 24th Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement
This is interesting, and if the DV system is taken out, it will help many in the eb category. This is good, hopefully it will come to a vote.
Jan 5th Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 24th Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement
This is interesting, and if the DV system is taken out, it will help many in the eb category. This is good, hopefully it will come to a vote.
hairstyles Samsung Star Wallpaper Part -6
number30
03-18 10:12 AM
I also don't think this is true. After you get your 3-year H1B extension beyound the 6-year limit and say your 485 gets denied while you are in 7th year, you can still stay and work for the rest of the 2 years on your H1B and use those 2 years to file for new LC etc.
Gurus, please advise, with the slew of mistaken 485 denials this is an important point to clarify.
He will have the H1 status until the expiry date. But only thing he may not be able to transfer H1 if there is no other case is pending.
Gurus, please advise, with the slew of mistaken 485 denials this is an important point to clarify.
He will have the H1 status until the expiry date. But only thing he may not be able to transfer H1 if there is no other case is pending.
EkAurAaya
11-30 09:18 PM
congratulations! So did you show your middle finger today?:D
:D I did enjoy my stress free day... didn't give the middle finger yet, but did bring up some things that have been bothering me for years... that need to change... no more taking me forgranted :D
:D I did enjoy my stress free day... didn't give the middle finger yet, but did bring up some things that have been bothering me for years... that need to change... no more taking me forgranted :D
indigokiwi
03-31 01:04 PM
Done.
0 Yorumlar